Minneapolis Fed research criticises China's 'quid pro quo' policy
'Quid pro quo' policy benefits China, but not the rest of the world
China's policy of exchanging market access for technology is damaging to welfare in advanced economies, according to Quid pro quo: technology capital transfers for market access in China, a staff report published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
Authors Thomas Holmes, Ellen McGrattan and Edward Prescott plug data on Chinese investments and patents into a multi-country dynamic general equilibrium model. The researchers simulate a fictional scenario in which China drops the ‘quid pro
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com