Minneapolis Fed research criticises China's 'quid pro quo' policy

'Quid pro quo' policy benefits China, but not the rest of the world

minneapolis-fed
The Minneapolis Fed

China's policy of exchanging market access for technology is damaging to welfare in advanced economies, according to Quid pro quo: technology capital transfers for market access in China, a staff report published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.

Authors Thomas Holmes, Ellen McGrattan and Edward Prescott plug data on Chinese investments and patents into a multi-country dynamic general equilibrium model. The researchers simulate a fictional scenario in which China drops the ‘quid pro

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

This address will be used to create your account

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.