Basel III implementation creating fragmentation, warns FSI paper

Authors say some variation is good, but more could be done to cut fragmentation

Fernando Restoy
Fernando Restoy, chairman of the FSI
Daniel Hinge

Differences in how Basel III has been implemented in different jurisdictions has led to “market fragmentation”, which could create an uneven playing field and hamper the flow of capital across borders, a paper published by the Financial Stability Institute (FSI) warns.

Rodrigo Coelho, Fernando Restoy and Raihan Zamil say differences in how banks calculate regulatory capital are a key source of divergence. In particular, the valuation of loans and how losses on non-performing exposures (NPEs)

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

This address will be used to create your account

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.