Fed’s NBFI scenario may be more use than CCAR – experts

Main severely adverse scenario does not capture contagion risks from any squeeze on non-banks

US Federal Reserve

The US Federal Reserve’s exploratory scenario focusing on non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) could be more useful than the main severely adverse scenario in the annual stress-testing exercise, according to risk management experts.

“The Fed has already squeezed as much as it could from the severely adverse scenarios,” says Viktor Tsyrennikov, an independent stress-testing consultant.

“They understand what happens to a bank in a big recession, and you cannot do much more.”

The Fed tinkers with

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.