IMF researchers say CCBs ‘show less promise’ than other macro-prudential tools

Working paper evaluates macro-prudential policy between 2000 and 2010

looking up into the clouds between buildings in the City of London

Counter-cyclical capital buffers "show less promise" than other macro-prudential tools in reducing the build-up of banking system vulnerabilities, according to researchers at the IMF.

In a working paper published today, Stijn Claessens, Swati Ghosh and Roxana Mihet analyse the impact of macro-prudential policies deployed in 48 countries between 2000 and 2010 on around 2,820 banks.

They group the policies into different categories according to whether they are aimed at borrowers or financial

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

This address will be used to create your account

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.