Czechs discuss appropriate capital requirements for Sifis
Systemically important banks could be required to hold more capital
Regulators considering imposing systemic importance-based capital requirements on banks must take care to impress upon markets that the designation of a financial institution as systemically important does not mean it seen as ‘too-big-to-fail' and, therefore, in line for a bail out should it get into difficulties, the authors of a new Czech working paper say.
In Capital buffers based on banks' domestic systemic importance: Selected issues, Michal Skořepa and Jakub Seidler – both of the Czech
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com