Stress indexes have widely varying signal benefits, Fed paper says
Methodology must improve to provide robust forecasts, authors argue
Central bankers need a methodology to identify coincident systemic conditions in a "timely" way, and to forecast adverse developments, a working paper published this month by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland argues.
In Evaluating the information value for measures of systemic conditions, Mikhail Oet, John Dooley, Dieter Gramlich, Peter Sarlin and Stephen Ong present what they say is a general-purpose evaluation framework for assessing measurements of systemic conditions.
They then apply
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com