IMF: stricter ring-fencing creates greater incentive to build capital buffers

IMF headquarters in Washington, DC

An IMF paper published in November shows that under stricter forms of ring-fencing, banking groups need substantially larger capital buffers at the parent subsidiary level than under less strict ring-fencing.

Ring-fencing refers to the restrictions on cross-border transfers of excess profits and capital between a parent bank and its subsidiaries when they are located in different jurisdictions. The paper's authors - Eugenio Cerutti, Anna Ilyina, Yulia Makarova and Christian Schmieder - analyse

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

This address will be used to create your account

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.