The myth of independence

US Federal Reserve stresses independence from government as central to ability to fulfil its dual mandate, but approach is fundamentally flawed

Handcuffs

The claim that independent or depoliticised central banks generate better price-stability outcomes than less independent central banks has now achieved the status of conventional wisdom.1 This conventional wisdom is widely accepted, and has influenced the institutional redesign of existing central banks, granting greater de jure, or legal, independence from government (for example, the Bank of England in 1997, the Bank of Japan in 1998 and the Bank of Korea in 1998). It has also influenced the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.