Capital controls less effective at curbing flows than macro-pru – BIS paper

Capital controls do not have significant impact on volume or composition of flows, authors find

The Bank for International Settlements, Basel
The Bank for International Settlements, Basel
Photo: Ulrich Roth

Macro-prudential policies are more effective at limiting cross-border capital flows than capital controls, research published by the Bank for International Settlements finds.

In the working paper, Jon Frost, Hiro Ito and René van Stralen conduct a two-stage empirical estimation. They seek to control for endogeneity that could result from countries being more likely to impose macro-prudential measures and capital controls during periods of high inflows. Their data spans 83 advanced and emerging

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

This address will be used to create your account

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.