‘Sandpile’ model makes case for supervisory intervention

IMF paper finds that arranging sales of failing banks is best policy, despite some side effects

Image of chess

A model that treats bank losses as accumulating grains of sand shows that the best policy for supervisors is to intervene in the case of a bank collapse and merge the failed institution with a stronger competitor.

Francesco Luna and Luisa Zanforlin, economists at the International Monetary Fund, present the results in a working paper, published on February 14.

The authors note that supervisory interventions have two countervailing effects: they promote financial stability by encouraging banks to

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

slide 1 to 5 of 8
Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.