‘Funding for lending’ may suffer side effects – BIS committee
Survey finds lending schemes tend to be effective, but firms may become dependent
‘Funding for lending’ (FFL) schemes were effective in alleviating the impact of the Covid-19 crisis, but may come with side-effects, a study published by the Bank for International Settlements finds.
The BIS markets committee found a majority of its 27 member central banks introduced FFLs for the first time in response to the pandemic. The schemes involve offering financial firms cheap funding if they increase lending to certain sectors. In many cases, the target sectors aligned with government
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com