BIS paper says liquidity regulation should not replace lender of last resort function
Lender of last resort and liquidity regulations perform separate roles
A central bank's lender of last resort (LOLR) function is best used to tackle a different kind of crisis than liquidity regulations and therefore one cannot replace the other, according to a working paper published on Friday by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
Why do we need both liquidity regulations and a lender of last resort? by Mark Carlson, Burcu Duygan-Bump and William Nelson studies the experience of the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis.
The authors argue the
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com