Text mining reveals differences in PRA approach
Researchers compare Prudential Regulation Authority’s communications to its predecessor
Researchers at the Bank of England have “mined” the text of communication by the Prudential Regulation Authority, finding its approach has changed relative to its predecessor.
David Bholat, James Brookes, Chris Cai, Katy Grundy and Jakob Lund use a form of supervised machine learning known as ‘random forests’ to analyse confidential PRA communications to financial firms. The authors say their approach allows them to study “deep linguistic structure”.
Their results, published today (October 27)
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com