Definitions matter when using DTI ratios – Riksbank paper

Choice matters for analysis and calibrating macro-prudential tools

Photo by David Lundberg
Sveriges Riksbank. Photo: David Lundberg

Regulators need to choose their definitions carefully when setting debt-to-income ratios as a macro-prudential policy tool or using the figure for financial stability analysis, an economic commentary published today (August 18) by Sveriges Riksbank finds.

Authors Peter van Santen and Dilan Ölcer show "significant differences" appear between ratios calculated on the basis of household or individual debt, and gross, net or disposable income.

Different measures have different pros and cons, they

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

This address will be used to create your account

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.