Supervisory lessons: fault lines in prudential regulation

Aistóbulo de Juan highlights the lessons he has learnt about weaknesses in prudential regulation

cracks-in-the-road

Practically all regulators worldwide now seem focused on regulatory capital, an obvious supervisory approach. However, asset evaluation and provisions for arrears and impairments are only weakly regulated in most countries. Proper income recognition of accruals may not even be regulated. As a result, regulatory capital per book, however defined, often proves ineffective and is, in any case, not necessarily real capital.

It is important to remember that cosmetic practices will take hold in

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

This address will be used to create your account